生物质鼓泡流化床和循环流化床气化对比试验
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)资助项目(2009AA05Z409);山东省科技攻关资助项目(2010GGX10702)


Comparison of Bubbling Fluidized Bed and Circulating Fluidized Bed in Gasification of Biomass
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在内径为Φ0.2m、高6m的流化床装置上,利用两种不同粒径的石英砂,分别进行了高速鼓泡流化床(BFB)和循环流化床(CFB)的冷态压力分布试验和热态气化试验。结果表明:冷态试验中,鼓泡流化床压力分布主要集中在底部的密相区,循环流化床压力分布更趋均匀。热态稳定气化阶段,循环流化床轴向温差只有40℃,气化的燃气热值、碳转化率和气化效率均高于鼓泡流化床。

    Abstract:

    The results from biomass gasification in a pilot-scale (6m tall×0.2m internal diameter) air-blown circulating fluidized bed gasifier was tested and compared with bubbling fluidized bed gasifier. The results showed that the diameters of bed material in bubbling fluidized bed and circulating fluidized bed were different. The bubbling fluidized bed had a dense zone and bed material was homogeneous distribution in circulating fluidized bed. The temperature of the circulating fluidized bed was more uniform than bubbling fluidized bed. The carbon conversion rate, gasification efficiency and low gas heat value of circulating fluidized bed were larger than that of bubbling fluidized bed gasifier.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

范晓旭,贤建伟,初雷哲,杨立国.生物质鼓泡流化床和循环流化床气化对比试验[J].农业机械学报,2011,42(4):96-99. Fan Xiaoxu, Xian Jianwei, Chu Leizhe, Yang Liguo. Comparison of Bubbling Fluidized Bed and Circulating Fluidized Bed in Gasification of Biomass[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2011,42(4):96-99.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: