玉米大豆不同间作系统光合特性与产量边际效应
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(32160506)


Marginal Effects of Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield in Maize and Soybean Intercropping Systems
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为明确内蒙古河套灌区间作模式的边际效应及该区域本土化玉米大豆间作技术模式,在滴灌条件下,设置4种间作技术模式(行比为2∶3、2∶4、4∶3、4∶4(T2∶3、T2∶4、T4∶3、T4∶4)),以玉米大豆单作为对照,对光合特性变化规律、种间竞争力及边际效应进行分析。结果表明,单作与间作玉米叶片叶绿素SPAD及氮质量比总体表现为大喇叭口期达到峰值,之后逐渐下降,进入灌浆期又出现一小高峰,此时,T2∶3模式叶绿素SPAD及氮质量比与单作差异均不显著,大喇叭口期,分别较单作下降0.91%、5.07%,灌浆期,较单作分别提高5.09%、5.17%,且净光合速率均于吐丝期达到峰值,但T2∶3较单作下降缓慢,其它模式的特点是峰值低,出现早(大喇叭口期),降得快。T2∶3模式与单作大豆叶片叶绿素SPAD和氮质量比均在开花期达到峰值,之后逐渐下降,鼓粒期又出现一小高峰,结荚期与鼓粒期,T2∶3模式SPAD较单作分别提高2.32%、5.11%,氮质量比分别提高2.34%、5.77%,且净光合速率峰值出现晚(鼓粒期),其它模式峰值出现早,降得快,尤其T2∶4、T4∶3、T4∶4模式的中行更显著。因此,间作群体花后光合功能稳定期长是关键,是发挥间作优势的重要原因。仅T2∶3模式土地当量比大于1,达到1.38,且大豆的相对拥挤系数大于玉米,间作大豆侵占力、竞争比率均大于玉米,T2∶3具有明显的间作优势和竞争力,大豆相对产量增长大于玉米,是竞争优势种。T2∶3模式的玉米、大豆产量最高,分别为9705、2265kg/hm2,占系统产量的81.08%、18.92%。T4∶4模式的玉米产量与叶绿素SPAD、净光合速率具有显著的边际优势,而大豆仅光合速率表现边际优势,T2∶3模式的中行大豆具有光合优势。综上,T2∶3模式是内蒙古河套灌区适宜的间作技术模式。

    Abstract:

    In order to clarify the marginal effect of intercropping patterns and the localized maize and soybean intercropping technical patterns in Hetao Irrigation Area of Inner Mongolia, four intercropping technical patterns (row ratio: 2∶3, 2∶4, 4∶3, 4∶4(T2∶3, T2∶4, T4∶3, T4∶4)) were set under the condition of trickle irrigation. The changes of photosynthetic characteristics, interspecific competitiveness and marginal effect were analyzed with maize and soybean as control. The results showed that the overall chlorophyll SPAD and nitrogen content of maize leaves in monocropping and intercropping reached peak at the large trumpet stage, and then decreased gradually, and then appeared a small peak at the filling stage. At this time, the chlorophyll SPAD and nitrogen contents in the T2〖DK〗∶3 mode were not significantly different from those in mono-cropping stage, and the chlorophyll SPAD and nitrogen contents in the large trumpet stage were decreased by 0.91% and 5.07% compared with that in mono-cropping stage, respectively. Compared with monocropping, the net photosynthetic rate was increased by 5.09% and 5.17%, respectively, and reached the peak at the spinneret stage, but T2∶3 decreased slowly compared with monocropping. Other modes were characterized by low peak, early appearance (large trumpet stage), and rapid decline. The contents of chlorophyll SPAD and nitrogen in the leaves of T2∶3 mode and monocropping soybean reached a peak at the flowering stage, and then decreased gradually, and a small peak appeared at the drum grain stage. At pod stage and drum grain stage, the SPAD value and nitrogen content of T2∶3 mode were increased by 2.32% and 5.11%, respectively, compared with that of monocropping. The peak value of net photosynthetic rate appeared late (bulging stage), while the peak value of other models appeared early and decreased rapidly, especially in the middle line of models T2∶4, T4∶3 and T4∶4. Therefore, the long post-anthesis photosynthetic stability period of intercropping populationwas the key, which was an important reason to exert the advantage of intercropping. Only T2∶3 model land equivalent ratio was greater than 1, reaching 1.38, and the relative crowding coefficient of soybean was greater than that of maize, and the encroachment power and competition ratio of intercropping soybean were greater than that of maize. T2∶3 had obvious intercropping advantage and competitiveness, and the relative yield growth of soybean was greater than that of maize, so it was a competitive dominant species. The maize and soybean yields of T2∶3 mode were the highest, which were 9705kg/hm2 and 2265kg/hm2,respectively, accounting for 81.08% and 18.92% of the system yield. Maize yield, chlorophyll SPAD and net photosynthetic rate in T4∶4 mode had significant marginal advantage, while soybean only showed marginal advantage in photosynthetic rate, and middle-line soybean in T2∶3 mode had photosynthetic advantage. In conclusion, T2∶3 model was the appropriate intercropping technology model in Hetao Irrigation Area of Inner Mongolia.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

崔文芳,秦德志,陈静,刘剑,严海鸥,秦丽.玉米大豆不同间作系统光合特性与产量边际效应[J].农业机械学报,2023,54(8):309-319. CUI Wenfang, QIN Dezhi, CHEN Jing, LIU Jian, YAN Haiou, QIN Li. Marginal Effects of Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield in Maize and Soybean Intercropping Systems[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2023,54(8):309-319.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-23
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-03
  • 出版日期: