喷杆喷雾机旋翼悬浮式喷杆自动收放控制系统研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

岭南现代农业科学与技术广东省实验室科研项目(NT2021009)、广东省乡村振兴战略专项(2020KJ261)、广东省科技计划项目(2021B1212040009)和吉安市科技计划项目(20211-055316)


Automatic Retraction Control System of Rotors Hovering Spray Boom Sprayer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    旋翼悬浮式喷杆分别融合了地面机械和空中无人机的优点,可简化复杂的桁架结构并通过旋翼下压风场能减小雾滴飘移造成的二次污染,具有较好的应用前景。传统的收放方式难以收放旋翼悬浮式喷杆,为此提出了一种以正四边形滚筒为主体的喷杆自动收放装置,建立了喷杆收放过程的D-H坐标系和正运动学模型,通过牛顿-欧拉法构建了动力学模型,并采用三次均匀B样条曲线轨迹规划获取了喷杆收放最优轨迹。以喷杆收放的运动时间、关节冲击和能量消耗为多目标函数,通过NSGA-Ⅱ算法求解Pareto解集,选取解集中喷杆展开时间为56、61、66、71、76、81s,喷杆收卷时间为54、59、64、69、74、79s轨迹进行喷杆收放试验。试验结果表明:喷杆运动时间与喷杆角度标准差存在显著性关系,运动时间越短,喷杆稳定性越差、关节冲击越大、能量消耗越多。取喷杆收放时间59、61s对应轨迹为喷杆收放最优轨迹时,滚筒转速与规划转速的平均跟踪误差不超过0.201(°)/s,关节3、4、5实际运动角度与规划角度的平均跟踪误差不超过6.201°,喷杆能较好地跟踪最优轨迹完成收放。该研究验证了喷杆自动收放装置的有效性和喷杆收放最优轨迹的准确性。

    Abstract:

    The rotor suspended spray bar combines the advantages of ground machinery and aerial UAV respectively, which can simplify the complex truss structure and reduce the secondary pollution caused by droplet drift through the rotor downwind field. It has a good application prospect. It is difficult to retract the rotor suspended spray bar in the traditional retraction and retraction mode. Therefore, an automatic boom retraction and retraction device with a regular quadrilateral cylinder as the main body was proposed, the D-H coordinate system and the forward kinematics model of the boom retraction and retraction process were established, the dynamics model was constructed by Newton Euler method, and the optimal trajectory of the boom retraction and retraction was obtained by using cubic uniform B-spline curve trajectory planning. Taking the movement time, joint impact and energy consumption of the boom retraction and retraction as the multi-objective function, the Pareto solution set was solved by NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm. The boom retraction and retraction test was conducted by selecting the trajectory of the boom deployment time in the solution set as 56s, 61s, 66s, 71s, 76s and 81s, and the boom retraction time as 54s, 59s, 64s, 69s, 74s and 79s. The test results showed that there was a significant relationship between the movement time of the spray bar and the standard deviation of the spray bar angle. The shorter the movement time was, the worse the stability of the spray bar was, the greater the joint impact was, and the more energy consumption was. When the trajectory corresponding to the boom retraction time of 59s, 61s was taken as the optimal trajectory for boom retraction and retraction, the average tracking error between the drum speed and the planned speed was no more than 0.201(°)/s, and the average tracking error between the actual motion angle and the planned angle of joints 3, 4, and 5 was no more than 6.201°. The boom can better track the optimal trajectory to complete retraction and retraction. The research verified the effectiveness of the automatic boom retraction and retraction device and the accuracy of the optimal trajectory of boom retraction and retraction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周志艳,向颖,陈羽立,余鑫,刘梓博,郑大腾.喷杆喷雾机旋翼悬浮式喷杆自动收放控制系统研究[J].农业机械学报,2023,54(4):120-131. ZHOU Zhiyan, XIANG Ying, CHEN Yuli, YU Xin, LIU Zibo, ZHENG Dateng. Automatic Retraction Control System of Rotors Hovering Spray Boom Sprayer[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2023,54(4):120-131.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-13
  • 出版日期: