基于雷达遥感的不同深度土壤含盐量反演模型
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0403302)、国家自然科学基金项目(51979232)和陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2019JM-066)


Inversion Model of Soil Salt Content in Different Depths Based on Radar Remote Sensing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为及时、有效地监测盐渍化土壤含盐量,以内蒙古河套灌区沙壕渠灌域为研究区,将Sentinel-1雷达影像作为数据源,同步采集不同深度土壤含盐量数据,通过组合两组雷达后向散射系数构建多种指数,并用灰度关联(Gray correlation degree,GCD)排除共线性强的指数,采用偏最小二乘回归(Partial least squares regression,PLSR)、分位数回归(Quantile regression,QR)和支持向量机(Support vector machine regression,SVM)3种方法,构建0~10cm、10~20cm不同深度下的土壤含盐量反演模型。结果表明,在3种回归方法中,SVM回归模型的精度最高,模型建模集决定系数R2c、验证集决定系数R2p均在04以上,建模集均方根误差RMSEc、验证集均方根误差RMSEp均小于03%,分位数回归模型次之,偏最小二乘回归模型最差;在各反演深度下,0~10cm深度的反演精度均高于10~20cm深度的反演精度,其中在0~10cm深度下SVM反演模型效果优于其他模型,R2c、R2p分别为0568和0686,RMSEc、RMSEp分别为0.201%和0.151%。本研究可为雷达遥感监测裸土期土壤盐渍化提供参考。

    Abstract:

    With the aim to monitor the salinization of soil salt content timely and effectively, taking Shahaoqu District of Hetao Irrigation Area as study area, the Sentinel-1 image as a data source, synchronous acquisition different depths of soil salinity data, by combining the two groups of radar backscatter coefficient to build a variety of indices, by using gray correlation degree (GCD) index to exclude the index with strong collinearity, and partial least squares regression (PLSR), quantile regression (QR) and support vector machine regression (SVM) were used to construct soil salinity inversion models at different depths of 0~10cm and 10~20cm. The results showed that among the three regression methods the accuracy of SVM regression model was the highest, the model modeling set determination coefficient R2c and the validation set determination coefficient R2p were all above 04, the modeling set root mean square error RMSEc and the validation set root mean square error RMSEp were all less than 03%, QR regression model was the next, PISR regression model was the worst. At each inversion depth, the inversion accuracy of 0~10cm was higher than that of 10~20cm, among which the SVM inversion model was better than other models at 0~10cm depth, R2c and R2p were 0.568 and 0.686, respectively, and RMSEc and RMSEp were 0.201% and 0.151%, respectively. The results could provide a reference for monitoring soil salinization in bare soil stage by radar remote sensing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张智韬,杜瑜燕,劳聪聪,杨宁,周永财,杨亚龙.基于雷达遥感的不同深度土壤含盐量反演模型[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(10):243-251. ZHANG Zhitao, DU Yuyan, LAO Congcong, YANG Ning, ZHOU Yongcai, YANG Yalong. Inversion Model of Soil Salt Content in Different Depths Based on Radar Remote Sensing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2020,51(10):243-251.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-15
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-10-10
  • 出版日期: 2020-10-10