典型草原自然保护地景观空间弹性GIS评价
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0507303)和内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2017BS0403)


Evaluation of Spatial Elasticity of Landscape in Typical Grassland Nature Reserve by GIS
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解草原植被恢复效果和理解草原生态系统弹性特征,以锡林郭勒草原国家级自然保护区为对象,在ArcGIS、Fragstats等软件支持下,从景观格局稳定性(LPS)、生态敏感性(LES)和人类活动干扰3个维度建立概念化景观空间弹性模型(LSR),分析评价了研究区景观空间生态敏感性和弹性特征。研究结果表明:草地、林地等景观格局稳定性较高,尤其是核心区,但LPS值远低于理论最优值,亟待提升;自然保护区内近60%的景观空间生态敏感性达到中度敏感,绝大多数类型的核心区及其缓冲区处于中高度敏感性水平,且从核心区到缓冲区高度敏感性面积占比呈现增长趋势;由于自然和人为活动双重作用影响,整个自然保护区中度以下低弹性区域面积比超过70%,从核心区到外部实验区,极低度弹性的空间范围不断增大,保护区60%以上区域应加强植被恢复;根据景观空间弹性表现,10.53%的区域需要重点保护,这些区域分布在保护功能区C区东部、E区西北部和D、E两区交汇地带。景观空间弹性框架及其概念化模型能综合考虑景观格局稳定性和景观空间生态敏感性,这对评价认识草原类自然保护地景观空间弹性特征、有针对性地制定草原植被恢复方案和优化保护功能区具有积极的指导作用。

    Abstract:

    In order to understand the effect of grassland vegetation restoration and understand the elastic characteristics of grassland ecosystem, Xilin Gole League Grassland National Nature Reserve was taken as the object, supported by ArcGIS, Fragstats and other software, a conceptual landscape spatial elasticity model (LSR) was established from three factors: landscape pattern stability (LPS), landscape ecological sensitivity (LES) and human disturbance, and the landscape spatial ecological sensitivity and resistance characteristics of the study area were analyzed and evaluated. The results showed that the stability of forest and grassland landscape pattern was higher at the class level, especially in the core zone,but the LPS value was far lower than the theoretical optimal value, and the stability level of landscape pattern needed to be improved. The ecological sensitivity of nearly 60% of the protected areas was moderately sensitive, and the majority of the core zones and their buffer zones were at the medium and high sensitivity level, and the ratio of the highly sensitive areas from the core zones to the buffer zones showed an increasing trend. Due to the dual effects of natural and man-made activities, the area ratio of low-elasticity areas below the moderate level in the whole nature reserve was over 70%, from core zone to external experimental zone, the range of extremely low resistance space was increasing, and vegetation restoration should be strengthened in more than 60% of protected areas. According to the spatial resistance of landscape, 10.53% of the areas needed to be protected, which was distributed in the eastern part of the protected functional zone C, northwestern part of zone E and the intersection of the zone D and zone E. The landscape spatial resistance framework and its conceptual model can comprehensively consider the stability and ecological sensitivity of the landscape pattern, and had positive guidance for evaluating and recognizing the landscape spatial resistance characteristics of grassland natural reserves, formulating grassland vegetation restoration plan and optimizing protection function areas.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵方博,岳德鹏,杨晓潇,于强,苏凯,屈志强.典型草原自然保护地景观空间弹性GIS评价[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(6):209-217.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-24
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-06-10
  • 出版日期: