不同水分胁迫情境下冬小麦生长发育的RZWQM2模拟
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2013AA102904)、陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目(2016KTZDNY03-06)、黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室开放基金项目(A314021402-1611)、西北农林科技大学人才专项资金项目(千人计划)和高等学校学科创新引智计划(111计划)项目(B12007)


Simulation of Winter Wheat Growth under Different Scenarios of Water Stress with RZWQM2 Model
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为提高水分胁迫条件下作物生长过程的模拟精度,根区水质模型(Root zone water quality model 2, RZWQM2)的开发者改进了原有的水分胁迫指标(Soil water index 1,WSI1)得到2种新的水分胁迫指标WSI2和WSI3。其中,WSI2用Nimah and Hanks方程修正影响光合作用的胁迫系数(Soil water factor,SWFAC)中的根系吸水项;WSI3则在WSI2的基础上加入了土壤蒸发项。为比较上述3种水分胁迫指标模拟水分胁迫条件下冬小麦生长发育的精度,并对其在关中地区的适用性进行评价,首先利用2012—2013年和2013—2014年两年度的冬小麦分段受旱试验对RZWQM2模型进行校准和验证,然后分别选取模型中3种不同的水分胁迫因子对2年(2012—2014年)分段受旱试验进行模拟,评价冬小麦的土壤水分动态、蒸腾总量、最终生物量和籽粒产量的模拟效果。结果表明:3种水分胁迫因子能较好地模拟生育后期轻度受旱条件下冬小麦的生长发育过程,但随着受旱程度的加深和受旱时段的提前,模型的模拟精度降低;相较原有水分胁迫因子WSI1,WSI2提高了各受旱处理的模拟精度,其中2年生物量的平均RRMSE降低了2.84个百分点,籽粒产量的平均ARE降低了1.43个百分点,且在越冬期和拔节期受旱处理的模拟精度提高最为明显。综上,现有RZWQM2模型对冬小麦受旱处理的模拟还存在一定局限性,可从改善物候期和ET模拟精度及加入旱后复水对冬小麦生长的补偿效应等方面进一步研究和改进。如需利用现有模型对水分胁迫条件下冬小麦生长发育过程进行模拟,建议选用WSI2。

    Abstract:

    Aiming to improve its ability to simulate crop growth and yield under different scenarios of soil water stress, the current stress factors of water stress index 1 (WSI1) was modified and two more different indices of WSI2 and WSI3 were created for the root zone water quality model (RZWQM2). The index of WSI2 was based on a modification of the soil water factor (SWFAC) for photosynthesisrelated processes in RZWQM2 using daily potential root water uptake calculated by the Nimah and Hanks approach. The index of WSI3 was based on WSI2 but with new terms accounting for the stress due to additional heating of the canopy by unused energy for potential soil evaporation in both the supply and demand terms of WSI2. The RZWQM2 model and these three different water stress indices were evaluated by using the data of soil water, total transpiration, biomass and grain yield obtained from a winter wheat experiment conducted under different water stress scenarios at different growing stages in two consecutive growth seasons of 2012—2013 and 2013—2014. The results showed that these three water stress indices were all able to correctly simulate the dynamic changes of winter wheat growth and soil water content when water stress occurred during the heading and grainfilling stages. However, when water stress occurred earlier and severer, the simulation accuracy became lower. Generally, the water stress index of WSI2 was better than WSI1 under different scenarios, since the relative root mean square error (RRMSE) for biomass was decreased by 2.84 percentage point, and the absolute relative error (ARE) for yield was decreased by 1.43 percentage point, especially when water stress occurred during the wintering and greening stages. In general, there were still some limitations for the RZWQM2 model to simulate winter wheat growth under arid conditions. Thus, the RZWQM2 model can be further improved in the following aspects, such as the response of phenology to soil water stress, the improvement of ET simulation, and the compensation effect of rehydration on winter wheat after long water stress. It was suggested that model users should choose WSI2, if the RZWQM2 model was expected to simulate the response of winter wheat to soil water stress.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

蒋腾聪,窦子荷,姚宁,冯浩,于强,何建强.不同水分胁迫情境下冬小麦生长发育的RZWQM2模拟[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(7):205-216.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-19
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-07-10
  • 出版日期: