水稻植质钵盘高强度结构设计与性能试验
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家农业成果转化基金资助项目(2009GB2B200101)、高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(新教师类)(2011230512003)、农业部农产品加工质量监督检验测试中心博士后科研工作站(大庆)资助项目(LRH-413)、黑龙江八一农垦大学博士科研启动资金资助项目(2011YB-08)、 黑龙江省教育厅面上资助项目(12531467)和黑龙江省高校创新团队建设计划资助项目(2014TD010)


High Strength Structural Design and Influence Test for Rice Seedling-growing Bowl Tray Made of Paddy-straw
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对水稻植质钵盘应用过程中存在的问题,对水稻植质钵盘结构进行改进设计。阐述水稻植质钵盘设计思想,探讨水稻植质钵盘结构改进设计思路及结构设计依据,分析改进前后的水稻植质钵盘结构强度,同时分别以改进前的水稻植质钵盘(CK1)、日本塑料钵盘(CK2)和平育秧盘(CK3)为水稻育秧载体,通过多年田间对比试验探讨改进后的水稻植质钵盘(CK)对水稻生产的影响。试验结果表明:改进后的水稻植质钵盘正应力较改进前水稻植质钵盘提高15.09%;CK和CK1秧苗移栽后均无缓苗期,CK2和CK3秧苗均需一定缓苗期;在生育期和收获期,CK和CK1秧苗素质均无显著差异,但均优于CK2和CK3秧苗素质;CK生产投入均低于CK1和CK2生产投入,但高于CK3生产投入;CK和CK1土壤有机质含量相同,在0~10cm、10~20cm和20~30cm土层,CK土壤有机质含量分别较CK2和CK3土壤有机质含量提高7.06%、10.08%,2.53%、3.34%,0.48%、0.11%;CK和CK1对土壤容重影响程度相同,与CK2和CK3相比较,在相同土层,CK能够促使土壤容重减小;CK和CK1产量持平,较CK2和CK3,产量分别提高10.59%和13.54%。

    Abstract:

    In order to solve the problems of rice seedling-growing bowl tray made of paddy-straw in the process of application, the improved structural design was made for the early rice seedling-growing bowl tray made of paddy-straw. The paper explored its structural design principle and design process. Compared with the early rice seedling-growing bowl tray made of paddy-straw (CK1), rice bowl carrier of Japanese (CK2) and actual rice production of China (CK3),the paper discussed influence on rice production by field test with rice seedling-growing bowl tray made of paddy-straw after improvement(CK). The results with CK, CK1, CK2 and CK3 as rice seedling carrier respectively showed that: the max normal stress of CK was higher than that of CK1. The seedling with CK and CK1 need not slow growth days, but the seedling with CK2 and CK3 slow growth days when they were transplanted in rice field. Rice-seedling qualities was not significantly different between CK and CK1, but which were better than CK2 and CK3. Cost of production of CK was smaller than that of CK1and CK2, but higher that of CK3. Influence of CK and CK1 on organic matter in soil profile was the same. At the soil level of 0~10cm, 10~20cm and 20~30cm, the organic matter in soil profile of CK were 7.06%, 10.08%, 2.53%, 3.34%, 0.48% and 0.11% higher than that of CK2 and CK3 respectively. Influence of CK and CK1 on dynamics of soil bulk densities was the same. Compared with CK2 and CK3, the CK could enable to reduce dynamics of soil bulk densities. The rice yield of CK was the same to that of CK1. Compared with CK2 and CK3, rice yield of CK was higher than by 10.59% and 13.54% respectively, which benefits to develop others bowl cultivation technology in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李连豪,张 伟,汪 春,张欣悦.水稻植质钵盘高强度结构设计与性能试验[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(11):88-97.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-07
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-11-10
  • 出版日期: