面向遥感分类精度评价的空间分层模式与分异性评估
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41801276)和北京市自然科学基金项目(8192015)


Spatial Stratification Mode and Differentiation Evaluation for Accuracy Assessment of Remote Sensing Classification
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为实现遥感分类抽样精度评估,以京津冀不同空间分辨率遥感数据产品为例,首先基于土地利用类型对遥感图像进行内部与边界对象划分,并构建不同的空间分层模式;其次,分别采用直接利用土地利用类型、图像8邻域算法、多尺度空间分异性方法、图像8邻域和多尺度空间分异性耦合方法进行空间分层;最后,设置与K-means聚类对比实验,并利用地理探测器定量评估不同空间分层模式的分异性。结果表明:不考虑内部与边界对象(6层)、考虑边界对象(12层)、考虑内部对象(18层)、考虑内部与边界对象(24层)和K-means(12、18、24层)空间分层模式相应的5组样本点集的q均值±标准偏差分别为0.252±0.02266、0.259±0.02245、0.321±0.01901、0.318±0.01806、0.269±0.00698、0.304±0.01056、0.317±0.01125;内部对象对空间分层分异性起主导作用,边界对象可以稍微提高空间分层分异性,分层数目也影响空间分层的分异性。本研究可更好地认识和理解内部和边界对象对提高空间分层分异性的贡献作用,对提出分异性更高的空间分层方法具有一定的研究价值和指导意义。

    Abstract:

    In order to evaluate the sampling accuracy of remote sensing classification, taking Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei remote sensing data products with different spatial resolutions as an example, the internal and boundary objects of remote sensing image were firstly divided based on land use types, and different spatial stratification modes were constructed, including without considering internal and boundary objects, considering boundary objects, considering internal objects, both considering internal and boundary objects. Secondly, direct land use types, image eight-neighborhoods algorithm, multi-scale spatial differentiation method, coupling method of image eight-neighborhoods and multi-scale spatial differentiation were adopted for spatial stratification, respectively. Finally, a comparative experiment of K-means clustering method was set up, and the differentiation effects of different spatial stratification modes were quantitatively evaluated based on geographic detector. The results suggested that the mean and standard deviation of qof the corresponding five groups of sampling sites for the spatial stratification modes of without considering internal and boundary (6 strata), considering boundary (12 strata), considering internal (18 strata), both considering internal and boundary objects (24 strata), K-means (12, 18, 24 strata) in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regions were 0.252±0.02266, 0.259±0.02245, 0.321±0.01901, 0.318±0.01806, 0.269±0.00698, 0.304±0.01056, and 0.317±0.01125, respectively. Internal objects played a leading role for spatial stratification differentiation and boundary objects slightly improved spatial stratification differentiation, and the number of strata also affected the differentiation of spatial stratification. The research results can better understand the contributions of internal and boundary objects on improving spatial stratification differentiation, and had a certain research value and guiding significance for developing spatial stratification methods with high differentiation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴亚楠,董士伟,肖聪,李西灿,潘瑜春,牛冲.面向遥感分类精度评价的空间分层模式与分异性评估[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(8):147-153.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-12
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-08-10
  • 出版日期: