中国水稻土酸化时空变化特征及其对氮素盈余的响应
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0200300)、国家绿肥产业技术体系项目(CARS-22-G-14)、中国科学院重点部署项目(KFZD-SW-112)和农业农村部委托项目(南方红壤中低产田改良培肥技术模式集成)


Spatio-temporal Variation of Paddy Soil Acidification and Its Response to Nitrogen Surplus in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对水稻土酸化造成作物减产和严重污染环境的问题,收集了1979—1985年全国第二次土壤普查成果和2015—2017年水稻土质量等级调查成果,结合2005—2015年全国测土配方施肥数据,采用空间分析和统计分析方法,分析了1979—2017年,39年间中国水稻土pH值空间分布的变化;计算了39年间不同水稻土pH值分级和区域的水稻土酸化速率,探讨了39年间氮肥投入变化量和土壤理化性质与水稻土酸化速率的关系;估算了2015—2017年水稻土单位面积氮素盈余量,并进一步量化了氮素盈余量与水稻土pH值变化量的关系。结果表明:39年间水稻土受土壤酸胁迫程度加剧,特别是水稻土由酸性(pH值为5.5~6.5)转变成强酸性(pH值小于等于5.5)的面积比例增加,这主要集中在长江中下游中部、南部和华南区中部、南部。39年间水稻土平均pH值下降了0.26,其中,东北区、长江中下游区、华南区平均pH值分别下降了0.34、0.29和0.58,西南区平均上升了0.14。39年间水稻土酸化速率从大到小依次为碱性水稻土、中性水稻土、酸性水稻土、强酸性水稻土,区域上水稻土酸化速率从大到小依次为东北区、华南区、长江中下游区、西南区。39年间,氮肥投入量和土壤容重变化量与水稻土酸化速率存在极显著的正相关关系,有机质含量和耕层厚度变化量与水稻土酸化速率存在极显著的负相关关系。2015—2017年,氮素盈余量与水稻土pH值变化量呈显著的负相关关系,氮素盈余量增加会造成水稻土酸化加剧。划定了3类水稻土治理分区,提出“治酸、防酸、控酸”的总体策略,并分区域制定了治理措施,可为水稻土酸化阻控和地力提升提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Paddy soil is the most important arable land resource in China, the acidification of paddy soil not only reduced the crop yields but also increased the risk of environmental risk. Data from the second national soil survey (1979—1985, the first period) and from the paddy soil quality grading survey (2015—2017, the second period) were collected, and were combined with the national soil testing and formula fertilization data from 2005 to 2015. The spatial analysis and the statistical analysis methods were used to analyze the spatio-temporal variation of paddy soil acidification. During the two periods, the spatial layout dynamic changes of paddy soil pH value and the acidification rate of paddy soil with different pH value levels and regions were analyzed, the correlations between nitrogen input, soil physical and chemical properties and acidification rate of paddy soil were discussed. Besides, the correlation between the nitrogen fertilizer surplus amount from 2015 to 2017 and the change of the paddy soil pH value from 2015 to 2017 was further quantified. The results showed that the intensity of soil acid stress on rice in China was increased during the two periods, especially the increase of area from the acid paddy soils (pH value was 5.5~6.5) to the strongly acid paddy soils (pH value was no more than 5.5), mainly distributed in the middle and southern parts of MLYR (middle and lower Yangtze River), and the central and southern parts of SC (Southwest China). From 1979 to 1985, the average pH value of paddy soil was 6.03, and it was dropped by 0.26 in the year from 2015 to 2017. Among them, the NC (Northeast China), the MLYR (middle and lower Yangtze River) and the SC (Southern China) were dropped by 0.34, 0.29 and 0.58 respectively, while the SW (Southwest China) was increased by 0.14. The acidification rate of the paddy soil survey sites during the two periods from high to low was as follows: alkaline paddy soil, neutral paddy soil, acid paddy soil, strongly acid paddy soil. Regionally, the acidification rate of the paddy soil survey sites during the two periods from high to low was as follows: NC, SC, MLYR, and SW. During the two periods, the paddy soil acidification rate was significantly positively correlated with the change of nitrogen input amount and soil bulk density, but was significantly negatively correlated with the change of paddy soil organic matter content and the plough layer thickness. From 2015 to 2017, there was a significant negative correlation between the nitrogen surplus amount and the change of the paddy soil pH value, such that the nitrogen surplus amount was increased with the decrease of paddy soil pH value. Therefore, the paddy soil remediation zones should apply the balanced fertilization with soil testing formula, control amount of nitrogen fertilizer, and promote environmental-friendly organic manure to replace chemical nitrogen fertilizer. Besides, in the remediation zone mainly with alkaline and neutral paddy soils, the technology of straw chopping and return to the paddy field with rotary tillage or moldboard tillage could be applied to decrease the paddy soil acidification rate. In the remediation zone mainly with acid paddy soils, the technology of straw returning could be applied to maintain the paddy soil pH value. In the remediation zone mainly with strongly acid paddy soils, the agricultural calcareous material could be used to raise the paddy soil pH value.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

叶英聪,孙波,刘绍贵,李文西,杨帆.中国水稻土酸化时空变化特征及其对氮素盈余的响应[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(2):246-256. YE Yingcong, SUN Bo, LIU Shaogui, LI Wenxi, YANG Fan. Spatio-temporal Variation of Paddy Soil Acidification and Its Response to Nitrogen Surplus in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2021,52(2):246-256.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-02-10
  • 出版日期: 2021-02-10