富士苹果采收成熟度光谱无损预测模型对比分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31701664)、中国博士后科学基金项目(2017M623254)和陕西省重点研发计划项目(2017ZDXM-NY-017)


Comparative Analysis of Harvest Maturity Model for Fuji Apple Based on Visible/Near Spectral Nondestructive Detection
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对苹果采收成熟度不一,导致果品贮藏品质不佳、病害率高等问题,基于可见/近红外光谱和成熟度评价指数建立快速无损判别采收成熟度的分类模型。根据盛花期后的发育时间,采集了3种成熟阶段(八成熟、九成熟和十成熟)样品的光谱信息。光谱预处理后通过“二审”回收算子法剔除异常样本,随机蛙跳(RF)算法提取特征变量,建立成熟度评价指数SIQI和综合评价指标FQI的偏最小二乘(PLSR)模型,SIQI指数和FQI指数的预测相关系数R为0.938和0.917。建立极限学习机(ELM)和支持向量回归(SVR)分类模型,并与2种成熟度评价指数结合SVR建立的分类结果进行比较。对比4种分类结果发现,基于SIQI+SVR构建的分类结果最好,优于直接分类模型,分类准确率为 85.71%。试验结果表明,可见/近红外光谱结合成熟度评价指数可实现苹果成熟度分类,为后续采收成熟度的无损检测设备研发提供理论参考。

    Abstract:

    Harvest maturity is a key factor affecting apple storage performance. Thus, in order to achieve batch harvesting and suitable picking maturity of apple, rapid and non-destructive discrimination model was studied based on visible/near infrared spectral technology. Apple samples were classified into three maturity levels (mid-ripe, ripe and over-ripe) according to different fruit development times after flowering. Spectral information of all samples was acquired by using the visible/near-infrared spectral system with a wavelength range from 200nm to 1100nm in the laboratory, and spectral differences of samples at different mature stages were analyzed. It was found that the spectral reflectance of the mid-ripe samples was significantly higher than that of the ripe and over-ripe samples. However, the spectral bands behind the ripe and over-ripe samples had similar spectral characteristics, resulting in overlapping. Then, after the preprocessing of SG and multivariate scatter correction method, a method using callback arithmetic operator named twice-detect was used to detect outlier sample for different quality parameters. Among them, five outlier samplers of the soluble solids content, two outlier samples of firmness and no outlier sampler in color factor were removed. Finally, the remaining 235 samples were participated in the modeling analysis. The characteristic variables of soluble solids, firmness and the parameters of L*, C*, h*, a andb were extracted by the random algorithm which can be modeled with a small number of variables. A maturity index coupling internal quality named simplified internal quality index (SIQI) and another maturity index coupling with factor analysis named factor quality index (FQI) were applied to evaluate the maturity of apple. Using the characteristic variable as input, the partial least squares prediction model of SIQI index and FQI index was established. The prediction correlation coefficient of SIQI index was 0.938, and the root mean square error was 0.216. Similarly, the prediction correlation coefficient of FQI index was 0.917 and the root mean square error was 1.152. Therefore, it was feasible to use spectral information to predict the maturity evaluation index of coupled multiple indexes. At the same time, the classification model using spectral information was directly established by the extreme learning machine (ELM) algorithm and the support vector regression (SVR) algorithm. By comparing the results of the four classification models, it was found that the classification results based on SIQI index combined with SVR algorithm were the best, which was better than the direct classification model. The classification accuracy was 85.71%. The results stated that the classification of apple harvest maturity can be achieved by using visible/near-infrared spectroscopy information and the maturity evaluation index coupling with related internal quality indicators. The research result can provide a theoretical reference for the development of nondestructive testing equipment for subsequent apple harvesting maturity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵娟,全朋坤,马敏娟,李磊,何东健,张海辉.富士苹果采收成熟度光谱无损预测模型对比分析[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(12):347-354.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-13
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-12-10
  • 出版日期: