基于可变集和云模型的河湖水系连通方案优选决策方法
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0405804、2017YFC0405801)、国家自然科学基金项目(51309254)和中国水利水电科学研究院基本科研业务费专项(WR0145B272016)


Optimal Decision Method for Interconnected River System Network Schemes Based on Variable Sets and Cloud Model
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    河湖水系连通工程方案优选是一个具有确定性的评价指标和评价标准与具有不确定性评价因子及其权重变化相结合的分析过程,所涉及的资源准则类、经济准则类、社会准则类、环境准则类、工程准则类等各评价指标具有中介过渡性,导致不同的多属性决策方法得到的结果具有不确定性,需对这些决策方法进行稳定性评价。根据可变集的对立统一数学定理,提出河湖水系连通方案优选决策可变集原理与方法,并提出了基于云模型的可变集决策结果灵敏度分析方法。以浙北引水工程中的新安江方案(S1)、富春江方案(S2)和太湖-富春江方案(S3)为例,分综合评价和不同准则评价两种情况评价分析了3种方案的排序,同时分析了单一指标变化和多个指标权重变化下的可变模型评价结果鲁棒性。结果表明:利用级别特征值和相对差异度来分析多准则综合评价结果,说明S3优于S1和S2;从指标灵敏度分析看,可变模型(α=1,p=1)和(α=2,p=1)综合评价的方案排序稳定性较好;从权重灵敏度分析看,4种参数组合的可变模型综合评价的方案排序容易受指标权重变化的影响,尤其是S2和S3;结合综合评价和不同准则评价的指标灵敏度和指标权重灵敏度分析来看,评价结果受指标体系的影响,说明该方法需要结合不同研究对象进行具体分析后选择合适的评价方法。

    Abstract:

    Decision on optimal selection of interconnected river system network schemes is an analysis process which combines deterministic evaluation index and evaluation criteria with uncertain evaluation factors and their weight changes. The evaluation indexes involved include resource criteria, economic criteria, social criteria, environmental criteria, engineering criteria and so on. Intermediary transition of these evaluation indexes leads to uncertainty in the results of different multi-attribute decision-making methods. How to evaluate the stability of these decision-making methods is worth studying. According to the theorem of the unity of opposites of variable sets, the principle and method of variable sets for optimal selection of interconnected river system network schemes were proposed, and the sensitivity analysis method of variable sets decision results based on cloud model was proposed. Taking Xinanjiang (S1), Fuchunjiang (S2) and Taihu-Fuchunjiang (S3) water diversion projects in northern Zhejiang Province as examples, the ranking of the three schemes was evaluated and analyzed in terms of comprehensive evaluation and different criteria evaluation, and the robustness of the evaluation results of variable model under change of single index and multiple index weights was analyzed. The main conclusions were as follows: using the rand feature values and relative difference degrees to analyze the results of multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation, it was indicated that S3 was superior to S1 and S2;variable model (α=1, p=1) and (α=2, p=1) comprehensive evaluation of the scheme ranking stability was better from the index sensitivity analysis. It can be seen from the weight sensitivity analysis that the ranking of the comprehensive evaluation schemes, especially S2 and S3, of the four kinds of variable models with different parameter combinations was easily affected by the change of index weight. According to the analysis of index sensitivity and index weight sensitivity combined with the comprehensive evaluation and the evaluation of different criteria, the evaluation results were affected by the index system to some extent, which indicated that it was needed to make specific analysis on the research objects to choose the appropriate evaluation method.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

冶运涛,梁犁丽,曹引,蒋云钟,赵红莉,王建华.基于可变集和云模型的河湖水系连通方案优选决策方法[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(12):211-225,313.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-12-10
  • 出版日期: