板结羊草地折翼式松土铲优化设计与试验
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD2001903)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(15053349)和国家自然科学基金项目(32360073)


Optimization Design and Experiment of Folded-wing Subsoiler for Compacted Leymus chinensis Grassland
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    适用于草地耕作的松土部件较为缺乏,为彻底打破草地土壤板结结构,设计了一种草地专用松土部件——折翼式松土铲。以折翼式松土铲的铲柄滑切角、铲翼宽度、铲尖入土角为试验因素,以耕作阻力、土壤坑形轮廓面积和垄形轮廓面积为目标参数进行结构参数优化试验;并对比分析了折翼式松土铲和3种传统松土铲(凿形铲、棱形铲、箭形铲)对板结草地土壤的松土性能(垄形轮廓面积、坑形轮廓面积、土壤扰动系数、土壤蓬松度、翻垡率和地表平整度)。试验结果表明,折翼式松土铲结构参数最优组合为:铲翼宽度40mm、铲柄滑切角20°、铲尖入土角20°,此时耕作阻力6140N,坑形轮廓面积160cm2,垄形轮廓面积68cm2。与3种传统松土铲相比,折翼式松土铲作业后的草地表面更为平整,产生的翻垡较少,且均为小土块翻垡;相同作业速度下折翼式松土铲造成的坑形轮廓面积和土壤扰动系数均最大,而垄形轮廓面积、土壤蓬松度、翻垡率和地表平整度均最小,故折翼式松土铲的草地松土性能优于传统的凿形铲、棱形铲和箭形铲。

    Abstract:

    There is a lack of soil loosening components suitable for grassland ploughing. To better break the compacted structure of grassland soil, a special soil loosening component for grassland was designed: a folded-wing subsoiler. Optimization of the combination of structural parameters was carried out by using the shank slip angle, wing width and tip entry angle of a folded-wing subsoiler as test factors, and tillage resistance, furrow contour area and ridge contour area as target parameters. The working performance (ridge contour area, pit contour area, soil disturbance coefficient, soil bulkiness, turning rate, and surface flatness) of the folded-wing subsoiler and three traditional subsoilers (chisel point, diamond point, and arrow point) in grassland soil was compared. The test results showed that the optimal combination of the structural parameters of the folded-wing subsoiler was as follows: the wing width was 40mm, the shank slip angle was 20°, and the tip entry angle was 20°. At this point, the optimal solution for the objective values was 6140N of tillage resistance, 160cm2 of pit contour area, 68cm2 of ridge contour area. Compared with the three traditional plough points, the surface of the grassland after the operation of the folded-wing subsoiler was more flat, and there were fewer turning pieces, and all of them were small pieces of soil; at the same operating speed, the pit contour area and soil disturbance coefficient caused by the folded-wing subsoiler were the largest, while the ridge contour area, soil bulkiness, turning rate and surface flatness were the smallest. Therefore, the grassland loosening performance of the folded-wing subsoiler was better than that of the traditional chisel point, diamond point, and arrow point. The research results can provide technical reference for the creation of key tillage components suitable for mechanized improvement of compacted grassland.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张学宁,尤泳,王昭宇,张宇卓,廖洋洋,王得伟,王德成.板结羊草地折翼式松土铲优化设计与试验[J].农业机械学报,2025,56(5):213-221. ZHANG Xuening, YOU Yong, WANG Zhaoyu, ZHANG Yuzhuo, LIAO Yangyang, WANG Dewei, WANG Decheng. Optimization Design and Experiment of Folded-wing Subsoiler for Compacted Leymus chinensis Grassland[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2025,56(5):213-221.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-04
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-05-10
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码